<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 List for Getting Poor Social Media Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:49:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mintsocial.com/2008/04/18/poor-social-media-marketing/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Pilsner Urquell&#039;s claim to fame is being the original pilsner. I would describe it as a crisp, bitter and bitey beer  with a full hops flavor, especially for a pilsner. Stella Artois is the mellower sister to this beer if I had to pick one to compare. Pilsner Urquell is a good beer to start with but I will stop at two and switch to something lighter. Stella on the other hand, does not have this issue. I recommend testing one out and then joining in on BeerSocial on &lt;a href=&quot;http://profile.to/matthewobrien/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Pilsner Urquell&#8217;s claim to fame is being the original pilsner. I would describe it as a crisp, bitter and bitey beer  with a full hops flavor, especially for a pilsner. Stella Artois is the mellower sister to this beer if I had to pick one to compare. Pilsner Urquell is a good beer to start with but I will stop at two and switch to something lighter. Stella on the other hand, does not have this issue. I recommend testing one out and then joining in on BeerSocial on <a href="http://profile.to/matthewobrien/" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a>.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nollmeyer - AcmePhoto</title>
		<link>http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nollmeyer - AcmePhoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 07:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mintsocial.com/2008/04/18/poor-social-media-marketing/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I hear that Belgium Skinny Dip is good, but I have not tried the PilsnerUrquell.  Can you compare it to a different beer?  Tnx!

(this is NOT an irrelevant blog comment just because I am asking about the irrelevant part of the blog post!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear that Belgium Skinny Dip is good, but I have not tried the PilsnerUrquell.  Can you compare it to a different beer?  Tnx!</p>
<p>(this is NOT an irrelevant blog comment just because I am asking about the irrelevant part of the blog post!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fairchild</title>
		<link>http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fairchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mintsocial.com/2008/04/18/poor-social-media-marketing/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>From your Top-10 Anti-Social list, these are crimes I&#039;m [somewhat] guilty of:

7. &quot;...only link to your own stuff (preferably one site so that Google knows you are nothing but a spam blog.&quot;

[Well, I don&#039;t link to my own stuff &quot;only&quot;, there are a total of 16 links to other sites (your mention of this made me go check/revise my list of outside links - now I have to go check them to see if they&#039;re all still working.)]

10. &quot;Openly bash your competition and anyone else for that matter over and over again so that you develop a predictable pattern for your posts.&quot;

[Hmmm, but in my story, Paul Allen is the EMPeror &quot;bad guy&quot;, with me the &quot;good guy&quot; - a good vs. evil incident that&#039;s actually happening.

11. &quot;Talk about something completely irrelevant to your blog post in the middle to throw people off track.&quot;
[This is tricky and my detractors accuse me of it. But what needs to be pointed out is that everything on my site derives from two &quot;processes&quot;: Retarded History - meaning the set back of our species because of its customs and priorities/unseen insight, and the second issue is censorship - my personal experience of having insights concealed by media moguls, which advanced Retarded History. So the problem becomes, many Hendrix fans view the site and say &quot;what does NASA&#039;s moon colony have to do with Jimi?&quot; (and they usually ask this as rhetorical domination with no intentions of considering whatever my answer might be - and there is an answer to that - that&#039;s the point - dominators seek to silence that answer. So, am I &quot;bashing&quot; them by pointing out this, by describing it and chronicling it?

13. Do not add images to your blog post
[Where this happens on my site is strictly a result of time constraints. A few times a year I get some hours to add pictures, about 2/3 of my site’s text pages have pictures, especially the Hendrix sections.]

15. Do not use social bookmarks like DIGG, Del.icio.us or Stumble Upon or feed your RSS into profile pages in the top social networking sites. In fact, if you have profile pages be sure to not update these or add links to your blog and company website.

[Stumble Upon does direct surfers to my site. I did register with them years ago. But the others you mention I haven&#039;t had time to study yet, but I know they exist.]

Michael Fairchild
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockprophecy.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rock Prophecy&lt;/a&gt; – &lt;a href=&quot;http://rockprophecy.com/about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sex &amp; Jimi Hendrix&lt;/a&gt; In World Religions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your Top-10 Anti-Social list, these are crimes I&#8217;m [somewhat] guilty of:</p>
<p>7. &#8220;&#8230;only link to your own stuff (preferably one site so that Google knows you are nothing but a spam blog.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Well, I don't link to my own stuff "only", there are a total of 16 links to other sites (your mention of this made me go check/revise my list of outside links - now I have to go check them to see if they're all still working.)]</p>
<p>10. &#8220;Openly bash your competition and anyone else for that matter over and over again so that you develop a predictable pattern for your posts.&#8221;</p>
<p>[Hmmm, but in my story, Paul Allen is the EMPeror "bad guy", with me the "good guy" - a good vs. evil incident that's actually happening.</p>
<p>11. "Talk about something completely irrelevant to your blog post in the middle to throw people off track."<br />
[This is tricky and my detractors accuse me of it. But what needs to be pointed out is that everything on my site derives from two "processes": Retarded History - meaning the set back of our species because of its customs and priorities/unseen insight, and the second issue is censorship - my personal experience of having insights concealed by media moguls, which advanced Retarded History. So the problem becomes, many Hendrix fans view the site and say "what does NASA's moon colony have to do with Jimi?" (and they usually ask this as rhetorical domination with no intentions of considering whatever my answer might be - and there is an answer to that - that's the point - dominators seek to silence that answer. So, am I "bashing" them by pointing out this, by describing it and chronicling it?</p>
<p>13. Do not add images to your blog post<br />
[Where this happens on my site is strictly a result of time constraints. A few times a year I get some hours to add pictures, about 2/3 of my site’s text pages have pictures, especially the Hendrix sections.]</p>
<p>15. Do not use social bookmarks like DIGG, Del.icio.us or Stumble Upon or feed your RSS into profile pages in the top social networking sites. In fact, if you have profile pages be sure to not update these or add links to your blog and company website.</p>
<p>[Stumble Upon does direct surfers to my site. I did register with them years ago. But the others you mention I haven't had time to study yet, but I know they exist.]</p>
<p>Michael Fairchild<br />
<a href="http://www.rockprophecy.com" rel="nofollow">Rock Prophecy</a> – <a href="http://rockprophecy.com/about.html" rel="nofollow">Sex &#038; Jimi Hendrix</a> In World Religions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Gilyeat</title>
		<link>http://www.mintsocial.com/social-media-marketing/poor-social-media-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Gilyeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mintsocial.com/2008/04/18/poor-social-media-marketing/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Nice, fortunately there is so much hidden in here that those that are new to blogging and other social media will miss much of what has been said and will continue to do exactly what is described here...  example, No4 how do I know what the most popular search terms instead of the unpopular ones so I will be sure and use those instead?  Or No9 what&#039;s a spam blog and where do I find them or avoid them?  Am I publishing one if I&#039;m not sending SPAM?

And finally, No6, how do I know what everyone already knows so I can be sure not to talk about something else?

Nicely written... I like it.

www.iangilyeat.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, fortunately there is so much hidden in here that those that are new to blogging and other social media will miss much of what has been said and will continue to do exactly what is described here&#8230;  example, No4 how do I know what the most popular search terms instead of the unpopular ones so I will be sure and use those instead?  Or No9 what&#8217;s a spam blog and where do I find them or avoid them?  Am I publishing one if I&#8217;m not sending SPAM?</p>
<p>And finally, No6, how do I know what everyone already knows so I can be sure not to talk about something else?</p>
<p>Nicely written&#8230; I like it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iangilyeat.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.iangilyeat.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
